↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Topical treatment options for conjunctival neoplasms

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Topical treatment options for conjunctival neoplasms
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, October 2008
DOI 10.2147/opth.s1606
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan W Kim, David H Abramson

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 3%
Colombia 1 3%
Nigeria 1 3%
Unknown 34 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 22%
Student > Postgraduate 6 16%
Other 4 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 6 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 65%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#3,207
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,572
of 101,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 101,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.