Title |
Update on denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient preference and adherence
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s75681 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elisa Cairoli, Cristina Eller-Vainicher, Iacopo Chiodini |
Abstract |
Patient adherence to many osteoporosis treatments, primarily bisphosphonates, is generally poor, thus leading to a significant reduction in antifracture efficacy. Patient perceptions about the necessity of the prescribed medication to treat osteoporosis and the concerns about the potential adverse effects are important and potentially modifiable determinants of adherence, in addition to other factors, such as difficult dosing regimens and high dosing frequency. Denosumab (Dmab) is a fully human monoclonal antibody against the receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), which, through the prevention of the RANKL/RANK interaction, inhibits osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and significantly reduces the risk of vertebral, nonvertebral, and hip fractures. It is administered subcutaneously every 6 months for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Preference and adherence to Dmab treatment were assessed in various clinical trials. Although with some limitations, available data suggest that Dmab is preferred to bisphosphonates, produces greater satisfaction than bisphosphonates, and would be preferentially chosen for long-term treatment. Moreover, patient perceptions about the necessity of Dmab treatment clearly outweigh the concerns about the injections, and positive beliefs about treatment positively influence medication-taking behavior. According to these data, Dmab may represent a reasonable alternative to bisphosphonates, particularly for osteoporotic women in whom a suboptimal or even poor adherence to oral treatments is expected. |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 38 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 21% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
Librarian | 3 | 8% |
Researcher | 3 | 8% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 46% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 8% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 8 | 21% |