↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Factors associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients with exacerbation of COPD

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Factors associated with hospital mortality in critically ill patients with exacerbation of COPD
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s168983
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hamish Brown, Stefan Dodic, Sheen Sern Goh, Cameron Green, Wei C Wang, Sameer Kaul, Ravindranath Tiruvoipati

Abstract

COPD is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients with COPD often require admission to intensive care units (ICU) during an acute exacerbation. This study aimed to identify the factors independently associated with hospital mortality in patients requiring ICU admission for acute exacerbation of COPD. Patients admitted to the ICU of Frankston Hospital between January 2005 and June 2016 with an admission diagnosis of COPD were retrospectively identified from ICU databases. Patients' comorbidities, arterial blood gas results, and in-patient interventions were retrieved from their medical records. Outcomes analyzed included hospital and ICU length of stay (LOS) and mortality. A total of 305 patients were included. Mean age was 67.4 years. A total of 77% of patients required non-invasive ventilation; and 38.7% required invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) for a median of 127.2 hours (SD =179.5). Mean ICU LOS was 4.5 days (SD =5.96), and hospital LOS was 11.6 days (SD =13). In-hospital mortality was 18.7%. Multivariate analysis revealed that patient age (odds ratio [OR] =1.06; 95% CI: 1.031-1.096), ICU LOS (OR =1.26; 95% CI: 1.017-1.571), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation-II score (OR =1.07; 95% CI: 1.012-1.123), and requirement for IMV (OR =4.09; 95% CI: 1.791-9.324) to be significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Patient age, requirement for IMV, and illness severity were associated with poor patient outcomes.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Other 4 9%
Unknown 16 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 17%
Engineering 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,838,109
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#562
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,529
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#20
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.