↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Local and Regional Anesthesia , August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#4 of 115)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
441 Mendeley
Title
Local anesthetic systemic toxicity: current perspectives
Published in
Local and Regional Anesthesia , August 2018
DOI 10.2147/lra.s154512
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kariem El-Boghdadly, Amit Pawa, Ki Jinn Chin

Abstract

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a life-threatening adverse event that may occur after the administration of local anesthetic drugs through a variety of routes. Increasing use of local anesthetic techniques in various healthcare settings makes contemporary understanding of LAST highly relevant. Recent data have demonstrated that the underlying mechanisms of LAST are multifactorial, with diverse cellular effects in the central nervous system and cardiovascular system. Although neurological presentation is most common, LAST often presents atypically, and one-fifth of the reported cases present with isolated cardiovascular disturbance. There are several risk factors that are associated with the drug used and the administration technique. LAST can be mitigated by targeting the modifiable risk factors, including the use of ultrasound for regional anesthetic techniques and restricting drug dosage. There have been significant developments in our understanding of LAST treatment. Key advances include early administration of lipid emulsion therapy, prompt seizure management, and careful selection of cardiovascular supportive pharmacotherapy. Cognizance of the mechanisms, risk factors, prevention, and therapy of LAST is vital to any practitioner using local anesthetic drugs in their clinical practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 83 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 441 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 441 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 50 11%
Other 38 9%
Student > Postgraduate 35 8%
Student > Master 35 8%
Researcher 31 7%
Other 71 16%
Unknown 181 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 170 39%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 21 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 2%
Unspecified 9 2%
Other 35 8%
Unknown 182 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 80. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2023.
All research outputs
#543,507
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#4
of 115 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,520
of 342,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them