↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Neurobehavioral burden of multiple sclerosis with nanotheranostics

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Neurobehavioral burden of multiple sclerosis with nanotheranostics
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s82768
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bhasker Sriramoju, Rupinder K Kanwar, Jagat R Kanwar

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic demyelinating neurological disorder affecting people worldwide; women are affected more than men. MS results in serious neurological deficits along with behavioral compromise, the mechanisms of which still remain unclear. Behavioral disturbances such as depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment, psychosis, euphoria, sleep disturbances, and fatigue affect the quality of life in MS patients. Among these, depression and psychosis are more common than any other neurological disorders. In addition, depression is associated with other comorbidities. Although anxiety is often misdiagnosed in MS patients, it can induce suicidal ideation if it coexists with depression. An interrelation between sleep abnormalities and fatigue is also reported among MS patients. In addition, therapeutics for MS is always a challenge because of the presence of the blood-brain barrier, adding to the lack of detailed understanding of the disease pathology. In this review, we tried to summarize various behavioral pathologies and their association with MS, followed by its conventional treatment and nanotheranostics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 87 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Master 7 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 23 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 21%
Psychology 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Neuroscience 3 3%
Other 14 16%
Unknown 29 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#1,151
of 3,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,400
of 286,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#30
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.