↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Intestinal microbiota: a novel perspective in colorectal cancer biotherapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
Title
Intestinal microbiota: a novel perspective in colorectal cancer biotherapeutics
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/ott.s170626
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chenbo Ding, Wendong Tang, Xiaobo Fan, Guoqiu Wu

Abstract

It is believed that genetic factors, immune system dysfunction, chronic inflammation, and intestinal microbiota (IM) dysbiosis contribute to the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer (CRC). The beneficial role played by the direct regulation of IM in inflammatory bowel disease treatment is identified by the decreased growth of harmful bacteria and the increased production of anti-inflammatory factors. Interestingly, gut microbiota has been proven to inhibit tumor formation and progression in inflammation/carcinogen-induced CRC mouse models. Recently, evidence has indicated that IM is involved in the negative regulation of tumor immune response in tumor microenvironment, which then abolishes or accelerates anticancer immunotherapy in several tumor animals. In clinical trials, a benefit of IM-based CRC therapies in improving the intestinal immunity balance, epithelial barrier function, and quality of life has been reported. Meanwhile, specific microbiota signature can modulate host's sensitivity to chemo-/radiotherapy and the prognosis of CRC patients. In this review, we aim to 1) summarize the potential methods of IM-based therapeutics according to the recent results; 2) explore its roles and underlying mechanisms in combination with other therapies, especially in biotherapeutics; 3) discuss its safety, deficiency, and future perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 14%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Researcher 10 9%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 32 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 36 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,100,904
of 25,870,142 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#352
of 3,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,605
of 343,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#15
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,870,142 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.