↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Medicinal plants with anti-inflammatory activities from selected countries and regions of Africa

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Inflammation Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
325 Mendeley
Title
Medicinal plants with anti-inflammatory activities from selected countries and regions of Africa
Published in
Journal of Inflammation Research, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/jir.s167789
Pubmed ID
Authors

Oluwafemi O Oguntibeju

Abstract

Various nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs have been shown to reduce pain and inflammation by blocking the metabolism of arachidonic acid by isoform of cyclooxygenase enzyme, thereby reducing the production of prostaglandin. Sadly, there are many side effects associated with the administration of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. However, there are medicinal plants with anti-inflammatory therapeutic effects with low or no side effects. The Afri-can continent is richly endowed with diverse medicinal plants with anti-inflammatory activities that have been shown to be effective in the treatment of inflammatory conditions in traditional medicine. Interestingly, scientists have examined some of these African medicinal plants and documented their biological and therapeutic activities. Unfortunately, medicinal plants from different countries in Africa with anti-inflammatory properties have not been documented in a single review paper. It is important to document the ethnobotanical knowledge and applications of anti-inflammatory medicinal plants from selected countries representing different regions of the African continent. This paper therefore documents anti-inflammatory activities of various medicinal plants from different geographical regions of Africa with the aim of presenting the diversity of medicinal plants that are of traditional or therapeutic use in Africa.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 325 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 43 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 9%
Researcher 25 8%
Student > Master 23 7%
Lecturer 13 4%
Other 51 16%
Unknown 142 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 49 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 9%
Chemistry 19 6%
Unspecified 7 2%
Other 27 8%
Unknown 153 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2018.
All research outputs
#13,548,681
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#217
of 811 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,202
of 331,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 811 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.