↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Novel ensemble method for the prediction of response to fluvoxamine treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Novel ensemble method for the prediction of response to fluvoxamine treatment of obsessive–compulsive disorder
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s173388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hesam Hasanpour, Ramak Ghavamizadeh Meibodi, Keivan Navi, Sareh Asadi

Abstract

About 30% of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) patients exhibit an inadequate response to pharmacotherapy. The detection of clinical variables associated with treatment response may result in achievement of remission in shorter period, preventing illness development and reducing socioeconomic costs. In total, 330 subjects with OCD diagnosis underwent 12-week pharmacotherapy with fluvoxamine (150-300 mg). Treatment response was ≥25% reduction in Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) score. In total, 36 clinical attributes of 151 subjects who had completed their treatment course were analyzed. Data mining algorithms included missing value handling, feature selection, and new analytical method based on ensemble classification. The results were compared with those of other traditional classification algorithms such as decision tree, support vector machines, k-nearest neighbor, and random forest. Sexual and contamination obsessions are high-ranked predictors of resistance to fluvoxamine pharmacotherapy as well as high Y-BOCS obsessive score. Our results showed that the proposed analysis strategy has good ability to distinguish responder and nonresponder patients according to their clinical features with 86% accuracy, 79% sensitivity, and 89% specificity. This study proposed an analytical approach which is an accurate and a sensitive method for the analysis of high-dimensional medical data sets containing more number of missing values. The treatment of OCD could be improved by better understanding of the predictors of pharmacotherapy, which may lead to more effective treatment of patients with OCD.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 23%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 10 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 19%
Computer Science 3 10%
Psychology 3 10%
Neuroscience 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,583
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,007
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#48
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.