↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Inflammatory milieu in contrast-induced nephropathy: a prospective single-center study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Inflammatory milieu in contrast-induced nephropathy: a prospective single-center study
Published in
International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijnrd.s171930
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ashraf O Oweis, Sameeha A Alshelleh, Ammar K Daoud, Mahmoud M Smadi, Karem H Alzoubi

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by contrast exposure is a common problem, which may cause a significant increase in patients in-hospital stay and therefore the cost of treatment. This study was conducted to evaluate the role of inflammation, inflammatory markers in predicting contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). This is a prospective study that was carried out in a major tertiary referral hospital in Jordan. Clinical data, blood and urine samples were collected from all patients admitted to the cardiology unit. All patients who agreed to participate in the study had creatinine level analysis 48-72 hours after the procedure. The CIN was defined as an increase in serum creatinine by 25% or 44 μmol/L from the baseline within 48-72 hours after the contrast administration. Patients with stage 4, 5 renal failure, patients on dialysis, and patients with recent intravenous contrast use, active infection or cancer were excluded from the study. Of the total 202 patients, 30 (14.8%) developed CIN. The incidence rate was 21.1% among females and 12.4% among males. In the multivariate analysis, beside eGFR, diuretics, and alkaline phosphatase, IL-33 was significantly associated with CIN, while the other cytokines did not to show this an association. Serum level of IL-33 was a significant predictor for development of CIN. Good clinical judgment and high serum levels of IL-33 may stratify patients into low and high risk for CIN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 4 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,646,262
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#165
of 240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,551
of 331,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nephrology and Renovascular Disease
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 240 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.