↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Proximal shift of colorectal cancer with increasing age in different ethnicities

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Proximal shift of colorectal cancer with increasing age in different ethnicities
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s166548
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Yang, Zhenchong Xiong, Wenzhuo He, Kunqian Xie, Shousheng Liu, Pengfei Kong, Chang Jiang, Guifang Guo, Liangping Xia

Abstract

Studies have indicated a variation in colon cancer pathology with increased age. More findings have also suggested differences in genetics, biology, and demography in terms of ethnicity. Large-scale studies closely examining tumor location shift with aging and ethnicity are scarce. We compared the tumor location shift with aging and the difference in survival based on tumor location by age group among the African-American, White, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients with colorectal cancer. We collected 270,390 cases from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database between 2004 and 2014. Ethnicity distribution between younger (age <70 years) and older (age ≥70 years) patients was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the tumor location survival difference in the African-American, White, and Asian/Pacific Islander patients. Larger tumors, female sex, M0, advanced N stage, no treatment, moderate to poor differentiation, total number of lymph nodes evaluated >12, and right-sided colon cancer were more common in patients aged ≥70 years. More adverse prognosis was found in younger patients compared to older patients. Tumor location frequency differed based on age; the most pronounced differences were found in White patients. The right-sided colon cancer survival inferiority was present only in White patients. Our findings support the premise of etiological and carcinogenic differences based on tumor location and between younger and older patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 15 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Computer Science 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,542,971
of 23,099,576 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#731
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,108
of 331,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#36
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,099,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.