↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cauda equine syndrome as the primary symptom of leptomeningeal metastases from lung cancer: a case report and review of literature

Overview of attention for article published in OncoTargets and therapy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Cauda equine syndrome as the primary symptom of leptomeningeal metastases from lung cancer: a case report and review of literature
Published in
OncoTargets and therapy, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/ott.s165299
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yang Liu, Bin Wang, Yongxiang Qian, Dongmei Di, Min Wang, Xiaoying Zhang

Abstract

Cauda equine syndrome (CES) is a neurological condition caused by compression of the cauda equine. Here, we demonstrate a case of CES as the primary symptom of leptomeningeal metastases from non-small cell lung carcinoma without brain metastases. A 59-year-old male suffered progressive lower extremity motor dysfunction, urinary dysfunction, and lower extremity sensory dysfunction. He was clinically diagnosed with CES. Nuclear magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated several vague nodules in the area of conus medullaris and cauda equine, without lumbar or thoracic herniated discs. The serum carcinoembryonic antigen concentration was 191.20 ng/mL. The conclusion following positron emission tomography-computed tomography was a right upper lung malignant tumor with mediastinal lymph node metastasis and cauda equina metastasis. Pathologic diagnosis was of primary adenocarcinoma of the lung by bronchoscopic biopsy. EML4-ALK fusion and EGFR mutations were absent, and thus the patient received chemotherapy. However, symptoms of intracranial hypertension arose 1 month later, and the patient died 3 months postadmission. Emerging CES may be a sign of metastasis of a malignant tumor, presenting an extremely challenging condition, especially for patients with lung cancer. Positron emission tomography-computed tomography is a fairly effective technique to make the diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Researcher 2 18%
Lecturer 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 1 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#16,053,755
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from OncoTargets and therapy
#889
of 3,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,886
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from OncoTargets and therapy
#31
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,016 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.