↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Current landscape and future directions of biomarkers for predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
Title
Current landscape and future directions of biomarkers for predicting responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s167400
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yingming Zhu, Fen Zhao, Zhenxiang Li, Jinming Yu

Abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), represented by anti-CTLA-4 or anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 pathway antibodies, have led to a revolution in cancer treatment modalities. ICIs have unique clinical benefits, such as effectiveness against a broad range of tumor types, strong overall impact on survival, and persistent responses after the cessation of therapy. However, only a subset of patients responds to these therapies, and a small proportion of patients even experience rapid progression or an increased risk of death. Therefore, it is imperative to optimize patient selection for treatment. This review focuses on the mechanisms of tumor escape from immune surveillance, the composition and activity of a preexisting immune infiltrate, the degree of tumor foreignness (as reflected by the mutational burden, expression of viral genes, and driver gene mutations), and host factors (including peripheral blood biomarkers, genetic polymorphisms, and gut microbiome) to summarize current evidence on the biomarkers of responses to ICIs and explore the future prospects in this field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 57 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Master 9 16%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,051,170
of 23,072,295 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#303
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,144
of 330,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#17
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,072,295 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.