Title |
Real-world comparison of the effectiveness and safety of different bowel preparation agents
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, August 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/ceg.s171861 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Naomi C Sacks, Abhishek Sharma, Philip L Cyr, Gerald Bertiger, David N Dahdal, Stuart P Brogadir |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 18% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Librarian | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 18% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
Computer Science | 2 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 7 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,530,891
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#257
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,930
of 331,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#7
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.