↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Spinal pain: current understanding, trends, and the future of care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
64 Mendeley
Title
Spinal pain: current understanding, trends, and the future of care
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, October 2015
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s55600
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregory F Parkin-Smith, Lyndon G Amorin-Woods, Stephanie J Davies, Barrett E Losco, Jon Adams

Abstract

This commissioned review paper offers a summary of our current understanding of nonmalignant spinal pain, particularly persistent pain. Spinal pain can be a complex problem, requiring management that addresses both the physical and psychosocial components of the pain experience. We propose a model of care that includes the necessary components of care services that would address the multidimensional nature of spinal pain. Emerging care services that tailor care to the individual person with pain seems to achieve better outcomes and greater consumer satisfaction with care, while most likely containing costs. However, we recommend that any model of care and care framework should be developed on the basis of a multidisciplinary approach to care, with the scaffold being the principles of evidence-based practice. Importantly, we propose that any care services recommended in new models or frameworks be matched with available resources and services - this matching we promote as the fourth principle of evidence-based practice. Ongoing research will be necessary to offer insight into clinical outcomes of complex interventions, while practice-based research would uncover consumer needs and workforce capacity. This kind of research data is essential to inform health care policy and practice.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 62 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Student > Master 5 8%
Other 4 6%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 18 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 17%
Sports and Recreations 4 6%
Psychology 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 19 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2016.
All research outputs
#7,217,714
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#724
of 1,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,601
of 287,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,996 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.