↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The effect of pelvic tilt and cam on hip range of motion in young elite skiers and nonathletes

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
The effect of pelvic tilt and cam on hip range of motion in young elite skiers and nonathletes
Published in
Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/oajsm.s162675
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Swärd Aminoff, Cecilia Agnvall, Carl Todd, Páll Jónasson, Mikael Sansone, Olof Thoreson, Leif Swärd, Jon Karlsson, Adad Baranto

Abstract

Current knowledge of the effect of changes in posture and the way cam morphology of the hip joint may affect hip range of motion (ROM) is limited. To determine the effect of changes in pelvic tilt (PT) on hip ROM and with/without the presence of cam. This was a cross-sectional study. The hip ROM of 87 subjects (n=61 young elite skiers, n=26 nonathletes) was examined using a goniometer, in three different seated postures (flexed, neutral, and extended). The hips of the subjects were further subgrouped into cam and no-cam morphology, based on the magnetic resonance imaging findings in the hips. There was a significant correlation between the hip ROM and the seated posture in both extended and flexed postures compared with the neutral posture. There was a significant decrease in internal hip rotation when the subjects sat with an extended posture with maximum anterior PT (p<0.0001). There was a significant increase in internal hip rotation when the subjects sat with a flexed posture with maximum posterior PT (p<0.001). External rotation was significantly decreased in an extended posture with maximum anterior PT (p<0.0001), but there was no difference in flexed posture with maximum posterior PT. The hips with cam morphology had reduced internal hip rotation in all three positions, but they responded to the changes in position in a similar manner to hips without cam morphology. Dynamic changes in PT significantly influence hip ROM in young people, independent of cam or no-cam morphology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 15%
Student > Master 4 10%
Researcher 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 13 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 8 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 5 13%
Unknown 16 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2020.
All research outputs
#6,518,121
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#114
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#113,569
of 331,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.