| Title |
Cytotoxicity and physicochemical characterization of iron–manganese-doped sulfated zirconia nanoparticles [Corrigendum]
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s97780 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mohamed El Zowalaty, Seïf-Eddine Naâdja, Thomas Webster, Rozita Rosli, Fatah Alhassan, Mothanna Al-Qubaisi, Mohamed Al-Fahdawi, Rasedee Abdullah, Y Taufiq-Yap |
| Abstract |
[This corrects the article on p. 5739 in vol. 10, PMID: 26425082.]. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 50% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 1 | 50% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2015.
All research outputs
#16,720,137
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,087
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,312
of 286,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#87
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.