↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Liver function tests in identifying patients with liver disease

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
Title
Liver function tests in identifying patients with liver disease
Published in
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/ceg.s160537
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zohair Ahmed, Umair Ahmed, Saqib Walayat, Jinma Ren, Daniel K Martin, Harsha Moole, Sean Koppe, Sherri Yong, Sonu Dhillon

Abstract

Many patients with liver disease come to medical attention once they have advanced cirrhosis or acute decompensation. Most often, patients are screened for liver disease via liver function tests (LFTs). There is very limited published data evaluating laboratory values with biopsy-proven stages of hepatic fibrosis. We set out to evaluate whether any correlation exists between routine LFTs and stages of hepatic fibrosis. A large retrospective observational study on 771 liver biopsies was conducted for evaluating the stage of fibrosis with AST, ALT, INR, BUN, creatinine, platelets, alkaline phosphatase, bilirubin, and albumin. Mean and 95% confidence intervals were used to describe the distributions of serum markers in different fibrosis stages. Multivariable generalized linear models were used and a two-tailed P-value was calculated. ALT was not statistically significant for any stage, and AST was statistically significant for stage 3 and 4 fibrosis. INR was statistically significant only in stage 4 disease but remained near the upper limit of normal range. Albumin failed to show a clinically relevant association. Platelets remained within normal laboratory range for all stages. The remaining laboratory values failed to show statistical and clinical significance. The health care burden from chronic liver disease (CLD) will likely continue to rise, unless clinicians are made aware that normal or near normal laboratory findings may be seen in asymptomatic patients. Earlier identification of asymptomatic patients will allow for treatment with new promising modalities and decrease morbidity and mortality from CLD. Our study shows that laboratory values correlate poorly with liver disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 166 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 17%
Student > Master 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Researcher 8 5%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 70 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Engineering 6 4%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 80 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,423,597
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#156
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,341
of 331,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.