↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Influence of body mass on predicted values of static hyperinflation in COPD

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Influence of body mass on predicted values of static hyperinflation in COPD
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/copd.s164096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Alter, Klaus F Rabe, Holger Schulz, Claus F Vogelmeier, Rudolf A Jörres

Abstract

For interpretation of body plethysmographic static hyperinflation, reference values are of crucial importance. Earliest reference values have been published by the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC) and are based on sex, body height and age as predictors. As obesity can lead to a reduction of functional residual capacity (FRC) in lung-healthy subjects, more recent approaches included body weight or body surface area. This raises the question whether these models are appropriate in patients with COPD-induced hyperinflation. Several FRC prediction models and their relation to body weight were analyzed in 1513 patients with stable COPD (mean [SD] age: 64.5 [8.2] years; GOLD grades 1-4: 219/722/484/88), a subset of the multicenter COPD and Systemic Consequences - Comorbidities Network cohort. Absolute values of FRC were inversely related to body mass index (p<0.001). Applying the ECSC equations to calculate predicted values, this pattern was maintained (p<0.001). By contrast, an inverted, ie, positive, relation occurred when using equations that include body weight or surface area (p<0.001). The present analysis confirmed the inverse relation of body mass and FRC in COPD, resulting from a restrictive ventilatory pattern by diaphragm elevation and decreased chest wall compliance in obesity. The weight influence in the prediction models, as obtained from lung-healthy controls, appears to lead to an overcorrection and consequently to an inappropriate overestimation of hyperinflation as indicated by FRC %predicted in COPD. It is concluded that models not including body weight as predictor, like the classical ECSC equations, could be superior in the interpretation of FRC in COPD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 15%
Student > Master 3 12%
Other 2 8%
Lecturer 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 12 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,292,294
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#1,732
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,369
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#46
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.