↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic for discrimination among different severities of Alzheimer’s disease

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic for discrimination among different severities of Alzheimer’s disease
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s174293
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lin Huang, Ke-Liang Chen, Bi-Ying Lin, Le Tang, Qian-Hua Zhao, Ying-Ru Lv, Qi-Hao Guo

Abstract

To find out whether the Chinese version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment Basic (MoCA-BC) and its subtests could be applied in discrimination among cognitively normal controls (NC), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), mild and moderate Alzheimer's Disease (AD), and furthermore, to determine the optimal cutoffs most sensitive to distinguish between them. A cross-sectional validation study. Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China. There was a total of 1,969 participants: individuals with MCI (n=663), mild (n=345), moderate (n=441) AD, and cognitively NC (n=520) were recruited from the Memory Clinic, Huashan Hospital, Shanghai, China. Baseline MoCA-BC scores were collected from firsthand data. Two subtests were calculated from MoCA-BC: the Memory Index Score of MoCA-BC (MoCA-BC-MIS) and the Non-memory Index Score of MoCA-BC (MoCA-BC-NM). MoCA-BC was an effective cognitive tool to discriminate among NC, MCI, mild and moderate AD in the Chinese elderly across all education groups, implying that it was efficient not only for detecting MCI, but for different severities of AD as well. For MCI screening, the total score of MoCA-BC (MoCA-BC-T) and MoCA-BC-MIS had similar high sensitivity and specificity. For discrimination among MCI, mild and moderate AD, the MoCA-BC-T and MoCA-BC-NM had similar performance. MoCA-BC is an effective cognitive test to distinguish between NC, MCI, mild and moderate AD among the Chinese elderly with various levels of education.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 16 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Psychology 9 18%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,762,265
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#643
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,081
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#13
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.