↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Validation study of a diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint-related pain

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
Validation study of a diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint-related pain
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s167033
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juichi Tonosu, Hiroyuki Oka, Kenichi Watanabe, Hiroaki Abe, Akiro Higashikawa, Koji Yamada, Takashi Kuniya, Koji Nakajima, Sakae Tanaka, Ko Matsudaira

Abstract

There are no specific radiological findings for the diagnosis of sacroiliac joint-related pain. A diagnostic scoring system had been developed in 2017. The score comprised the sum of scores of six items. The score ranged from 0 to 9 points, and the cutoff was calculated as 4. To evaluate the validity of the diagnostic scoring system for sacroiliac joint-related pain. The sacroiliac joint-related pain group (n=31) comprised patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint-related pain based on patient history, physical findings, and responses to analgesic periarticular injection. In addition, it was confirmed that they had no other lumbar or hip joint diseases. The non-sacroiliac joint-related pain group (n=123) comprised patients with low back pain due to a reason other than sacroiliac joint-related pain. We evaluated scores for all subjects. We analyzed the differences in each item between both groups and performed receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis to evaluate the score validity. There were no significant differences in patient characteristics between groups. There were significant differences for the following four of six items: one-finger test results (P<0.0001), pain while sitting on a chair (P=0.0141), sacroiliac joint shear test results (P<0.0001), and tenderness of the posterosuperior iliac spine (P<0.0001). The cut-off value was 5 points, the area under the curve was 0.80239, sensitivity was 77.4%, and specificity was 76.4%. The score demonstrated moderate validity for diagnosing sacroiliac joint-related pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 10 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 8%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2023.
All research outputs
#6,559,532
of 23,942,155 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#647
of 1,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,386
of 334,166 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#22
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,942,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,852 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,166 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.