↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The expenditures related to the use of antifungal drugs in patients with hematological cancers: a cost analysis

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
The expenditures related to the use of antifungal drugs in patients with hematological cancers: a cost analysis
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s92455
Pubmed ID
Authors

Habip Gedik

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze the expenditures related to the use of antifungal drugs in patients with hematological malignancies. In this retrospective study, the expenditures related to use of antifungal drugs for treatment of invasive fungal infections in patients with hematological malignancies between November 2010 and November 2012 were analyzed. Expenditures of antifungal drugs were calculated by converting the price billed to the Republic of Turkey Social Security Institution per patient using the US dollar ($) exchange rate. We retrospectively analyzed the expenditures related to the use of antifungal drugs in 282 febrile episodes of 126 neutropenic patients. Voriconazole (VOR), caspofungin, and liposomal amphotericin B (L-AmB) were administered as a first-line antifungal therapy to treat 72 febrile episodes of 65 neutropenic patients, 45 febrile episodes of 37 neutropenic patients, and 34 febrile episodes of 32 neutropenic patients, respectively. The expenditures related to the use of antifungal drugs per febrile neutropenic episode were $3,857.85 for VOR; $15,783.34 for caspofungin, and $21,561.02 for L-AmB, respectively. The expenditure related to the use of posaconazole (POS) was $32,167.39 per patient for primary or secondary prophylaxis. Improving conditions in the patient's room, choosing pre-emptive antifungal treatment instead of empirical antifungal treatment, switching to tablet form of VOR after initiation of its intravenous form, secondary prophylaxis with VOR against invasive aspergillosis, primary prophylaxis with POS in high-risk patients, and choosing less L-AmB as being an alternative to other antifungal drugs, may reduce expenditures related to the use of antifungal drugs in the treatment of invasive fungal infections during febrile neutropenic episodes of patients with hematological malignancies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 7 23%
Unknown 7 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 10%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 9 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2016.
All research outputs
#8,221,102
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#192
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,331
of 295,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.