↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Effects of behavioral activation program without psychotropic medication treatment for depression in late adolescence: case report

Overview of attention for article published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Effects of behavioral activation program without psychotropic medication treatment for depression in late adolescence: case report
Published in
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/ndt.s168077
Pubmed ID
Authors

Koki Takagaki, Yasumasa Okamoto, Ran Jinnin, Satoshi Yokoyama, Atsuo Yoshino, Fumi Kagawa, Yuri Okamoto, Yoshie Miyake, Shigeto Yamawaki

Abstract

A Japanese study revealed that 20.7% of first-year undergraduate students had a major depressive episode during the previous 12 months: first-year undergraduate students with depression need early support. Reportedly, antidepressant medication use during adolescence is associated with modestly increased risk of suicidality. This case study of a late-adolescent woman with depression illustrates the effects of behavioral activation without psychotropic medication. A first-year undergraduate student was diagnosed as having major depressive disorder. From earlier studies, we developed a behavioral activation program for late-adolescent people with major depressive disorder. Behavioral activation administered in 10 weekly 60-minute sessions decreased depressive symptoms, avoidant behaviors, and rumination. Moreover, the Beck Depression Inventory, second version score was 1 at 1-year follow-up. Results of this case study show that behavioral activation is effective without psychotropic medication. Future studies of large samples must be conducted to assess the effectiveness of behavioral activation without psychotropic medication for depression in late adolescence.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Student > Master 4 10%
Lecturer 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 43%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Energy 1 2%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#2,583
of 3,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,007
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
#48
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.