↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages

Overview of attention for article published in Pragmatic and Observational Research, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
Title
Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages
Published in
Pragmatic and Observational Research, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/por.s89946
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franz Porzsolt, Natália Galito Rocha, Alessandra C Toledo-Arruda, Tania G Thomaz, Cristiane Moraes, Thais R Bessa-Guerra, Mauricio Leão, Arn Migowski, André R Araujo da Silva, Christel Weiss

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 101 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 17%
Researcher 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 17 17%
Unknown 30 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 14%
Psychology 7 7%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 34 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#2,921,955
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Pragmatic and Observational Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,593
of 295,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pragmatic and Observational Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them