↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Distinct prognostic values of mRNA expression of glutathione peroxidases in non–small cell lung cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Distinct prognostic values of mRNA expression of glutathione peroxidases in non–small cell lung cancer
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s163432
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kui Liu, Meng Jin, Li Xiao, Huiguo Liu, Shuang Wei

Abstract

Glutathione peroxidases (GPxs) constitutes an enzyme family which has the ability to reduce free hydrogen peroxide to water and lipid hydroperoxides to their corresponding alcohols, and its main biological roles are to protect organisms from oxidative stress-induced damage. GPxs include eight members in different tissues of the body, and they play essential roles in carcinogenesis. However, the prognostic value of individual GPx in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains elusive. In the current study, we investigated the prognostic value of GPxs in NSCLC patients through the "Kaplan-Meier plotter" database, wherein updated gene expression data and survival information from a total of 1,926 NSCLC patients are included. High expression of GPx1 mRNA was correlated with worse overall survival (OS) in adenocarcinoma patients. High expression of GPx2 mRNA was correlated with worse OS for all NSCLC patients. In contrast, high expression of GPx3 mRNA was associated with better OS for all NSCLC patients. High expression of GPx4 mRNA was significantly correlated with worsening adenocarcinoma in these patients. GPx5 mRNA high expression correlated with worsening OS for all NSCLC patients. The current findings of prognostic values of individual mRNA expression of GPxs in NSCLC patients indicate some GPxs may have prognostic value in NSCLC patients, and this needs further study.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 4 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2018.
All research outputs
#20,532,290
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,406
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#288,941
of 331,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#68
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.