↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Liver disease and mortality among patients with hip fracture: a population-based cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Epidemiology, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Liver disease and mortality among patients with hip fracture: a population-based cohort study
Published in
Clinical Epidemiology, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/clep.s168237
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Montomoli, Rune Erichsen, Henrik Gammelager, Alma B Pedersen

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the prognostic impact of liver disease on mortality following hip fracture (HF). This nationwide cohort study, based on prospectively collected data retrieved from Danish registries, included all patients diagnosed with incident HF in Denmark during 1996-2013. Patients were classified based on the coexisting liver disease at the time of HF, ie, no liver disease, noncirrhotic liver disease, and liver cirrhosis. We computed 30-day and 31-365-day mortality risks. To compare patients with and without liver disease, we computed mortality adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using Cox regression controlled for potential confounders. Among 152,180 HF patients, 2,552 (1.7%) patients had noncirrhotic liver disease and 1,866 (1.2%) patients had liver cirrhosis. Thirty-day mortality was 9.4% among patients with noncirrhotic liver disease, 12.6% among patients with liver cirrhosis patients, and 9.7% among patients without liver disease. Compared to patients without liver disease, crude and adjusted HRs within 30 days following HF were, respectively, 0.96 (95% CI: 0.85-1.10) and 1.24 (95% CI: 1.09-1.41) for patients with noncirrhotic liver disease and 1.30 (95% CI: 1.14-1.48) and 2.25 (95% CI: 1.96-2.59) for those with liver cirrhosis. Among patients who survived 30 days post-HF, the 31-365-day mortality was 18.5% among patients with noncirrhotic liver disease, 26.4% among patients with liver cirrhosis, and 19.4% among patients without liver disease. Corresponding crude and adjusted HRs were, respectively, 0.95 (95% CI: 0.86-1.04) and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.99-1.20) for patients with noncirrhotic liver disease and 1.40 (95% CI: 1.27-1.54) and 1.91 (95% CI: 1.72-2.12) for those with liver cirrhosis. Liver disease patients, especially those with liver cirrhosis, had increased 30-day mortality and 31-365-day mortality following HF, compared to patients without liver disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#15,544,609
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#480
of 727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,113
of 331,050 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 727 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,050 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.