↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The total alkaloids from Coptis chinensis Franch improve cognitive deficits in type 2 diabetic rats

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
The total alkaloids from Coptis chinensis Franch improve cognitive deficits in type 2 diabetic rats
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, August 2018
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s171025
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jia-Chuan Li, Xiao-Fei Shen, Jun-Ao Shao, Meng-Min Tao, Jian Gu, Jingyu Li, Ning Huang

Abstract

Coptis chinensis Franch is extensively used in traditional Chinese medicine to treat diabetes and dementia. Alkaloids are the main active ingredients of C. chinensis. This study was designed to probe the effects and possible mechanisms of the total alkaloids from C. chinensis (TAC) on cognitive deficits in type 2 diabetic rats. Cognitive deficits were induced in rats by streptozotocin and high glucose/high fat diet. After treatment with TAC (80, 120, and 180 mg/kg) for 24 weeks, the behavioral parameters of each rat were assessed by Morris water maze and Y-maze tests. The indexes of glucose and lipid metabolism, pathological changes of brain tissue, and the phosphorylation levels of insulin signaling related proteins were also evaluated. The type 2 diabetic rats showed significantly elevated levels of fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin and glycosylated serum protein, as well as apolipoprotein B, free fatty acid, triglyceride and total cholesterol but decreased the content of apolipoprotein A1, and TAC treatment dose-dependently reversed these abnormal changes. Furthermore, the behavioral results showed that TAC alleviated the cognitive deficits in type 2 diabetic rats. Moreover, immunohistochemical and histopathologic examinations indicated that the diabetic rats showed significant Aβ deposition, and neuronal damage and loss, which can be reversed by TAC treatment. The western blot results showed that TAC treatment markedly increased the phosphorylation of IRS, PI3K, and Akt, and inhibited the overactivation of GSK3β in the brain of type 2 diabetic rats. These findings conclude that TAC prevents diabetic cognitive deficits, most likely by ameliorating the disorder of glucose and lipid metabolism, attenuating Aβ deposition, and enhancing insulin signaling.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 3 9%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 13 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Philosophy 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 14 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,376,384
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#1,108
of 2,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,711
of 342,157 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#38
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,157 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.