↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Advanced basal cell carcinoma, the hedgehog pathway, and treatment options – role of smoothened inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Biologics: Targets & Therapy, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Advanced basal cell carcinoma, the hedgehog pathway, and treatment options – role of smoothened inhibitors
Published in
Biologics: Targets & Therapy, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/btt.s54179
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leslie A Fecher, William H Sharfman

Abstract

Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common human cancer and its incidence is rising worldwide. Ultraviolet radiation exposure, including tanning bed use, as well as host factors play a role in its development. The majority of cases are treated and cured with local therapies including surgery. Yet, the health care costs of diagnosis and treatment of BCCs in the US is substantial. In the United States, the cost of nonmelanoma skin cancer care in the Medicare population is estimated to be US$426 million per year. While rare, locally advanced BCCs that can no longer be controlled with surgery and/or radiation, and metastatic BCCs do occur and can be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Vismodegib (GDC-0449), a smoothened inhibitor targeted at the hedgehog pathway, is the first US Food and Drug Association (FDA)-approved agent in the treatment of locally advanced, unresectable, and metastatic BCCs. This class of agents appears to be changing the survival rates in advanced BCC patients, but appropriate patient selection and monitoring are important. Multidisciplinary assessments are essential for the optimal care and management of these patients. For some patients with locally advanced BCC, treatment with a hedgehog inhibitor may eliminate the need for an excessively disfiguring or morbid surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 85 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Other 9 10%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 21 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 25 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2023.
All research outputs
#8,262,445
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#105
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,058
of 294,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biologics: Targets & Therapy
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.