Title |
Systematic review and meta-analysis: bezafibrate in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis [Erratum]
|
---|---|
Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s98298 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chuanyong Guo, Qin Yin, Huerxidan Abudumijiti, Yingqun Zhou, Yuqing Zhou, Rongxia Chen, Rong Zhang, Yujing Xia, Fan Wang, Jingjing Li, Yuanyuan Zheng, Kan Chen, Jie Lu, Jianrong Wang, Wenxia Lu, Sainan Li, Tong Liu |
Abstract |
[This corrects the article on p. 5407 in vol. 9.]. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 1 | 33% |
Student > Master | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2015.
All research outputs
#3,709,974
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#231
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,088
of 294,811 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#9
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,811 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.