| Title |
Comparing the effects of nano-sized sugarcane fiber with cellulose and psyllium on hepatic cellular signaling in mice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s30887 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhong Q Wang, Yongmei Yu, Xian H Zhang, Z Elizabeth Floyd, Anik Boudreau, Kun Lian, William T Cefalu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 42 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,952,795
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#727
of 4,141 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,736
of 179,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#20
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,141 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,594 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.