↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Macrophage activation syndrome: early diagnosis is key

Overview of attention for article published in Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 192)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 X users
patent
3 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
108 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
Title
Macrophage activation syndrome: early diagnosis is key
Published in
Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews , August 2018
DOI 10.2147/oarrr.s151013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Butsabong Lerkvaleekul, Soamarat Vilaiyuk

Abstract

Macrophage activation syndrome (MAS) is a life-threatening condition, and it is a subset of hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). The clinical features include a persistent high-grade fever, hepatosplenomegaly, lymphadenopathy, hemorrhagic manifestations, and a sepsis-like condition. From the clinical features, it is usually difficult to differentiate between a true sepsis, disease flare-ups, or MAS. Although the laboratory abnormalities are similar to those of a disseminated intravascular coagulation, which shows pancytopenia, coagulopathy, hypofibrinogenemia, and an elevated d-dimer test, it can also be a late stage of MAS. Currently, MAS is still underrecognized and usually results in delayed in diagnosis, which leads to high morbidity and mortality. This literature review was conducted in the context of the clinical manifestations and the laboratory abnormalities in MAS, which might provide some clues for an early diagnosis. The best ways for an early recognition and a satisfactory diagnosis were based on the relative changes in the overall parameters from the baseline, together with a thorough and continuous physical examination for these kinds of patients. At present, diagnostic criteria have been proposed for HLH, MAS-associated systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis, and an MAS-associated systemic lupus erythematosus. Therefore, selecting the proper diagnostic criteria for use is essential because not all of the criteria are suitable for every autoimmune disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 13%
Other 20 13%
Student > Postgraduate 20 13%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 49 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,609,145
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#9
of 192 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,068
of 341,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open Access Rheumatology : Research and Reviews
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 192 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them