↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Attitudes of cancer patients and their families toward disclosure of cancer diagnosis in Saudi Arabia: a Middle Eastern population example

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
27 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Attitudes of cancer patients and their families toward disclosure of cancer diagnosis in Saudi Arabia: a Middle Eastern population example
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s176651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ahmad S Alzahrani, Abdullah Alqahtani, Maher Alhazmi, Rehab Gaafar, Doaa Bajabir, Ibtehaj M Alharbi, Ashwaq MF Alharbi, Ghufran Kheshaifaty, Aamer Alzahrani

Abstract

Particularly in the Middle East, few studies have explored the attitude of cancer patients and their families toward cancer diagnosis disclosure (CDD). This study was conducted to investigate the preference and attitude of a sample of cancer patients and their families in Saudi Arabia toward CDD. We constructed a questionnaire based on previous studies. The questionnaire assessed preference and attitude toward CDD. Participants were recruited from the King Abdullah Medical City, which has one of the largest cancer centers in Saudi Arabia. Three hundred and four cancer patients and 277 of their family members participated in the study. The patient group preferred CDD more than the family group (82.6% vs 75.3%, P<0.05). This preference is especially more evident toward disclosure of detailed cancer information (status, prognosis, and treatment) (83.6% vs 59.9%, P<0.001). In a binary logistic regression, factors associated with preference toward CDD included having information about cancer (odds ratio [OR] 1.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.84) and being employed (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1-2.82) while being from the patient group was the only factor associated with preference toward detailed cancer information (OR, 3.25; 95% CI, 2.11-5.05). In terms of patient reaction after CDD, "fear" was the attitude expected by the family group more than the patient group (56.3% vs 70.4%, P<0.001) while "acceptance" was the attitude anticipated by the patient group more than the family group (38% vs 15.2%, P<0.001). Patients preferred CDD and disclosure of related information, while their families were more inclined toward scarce disclosure. Family members seem to experience negative attitudes more than the patients themselves.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 20 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 18%
Psychology 6 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,691,063
of 25,653,515 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#67
of 1,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,632
of 346,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#1
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,653,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.