↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Choroidal thickening and macular serous retinal detachment in pregnancy-induced hypertension

Overview of attention for article published in International Medical Case Reports Journal, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Choroidal thickening and macular serous retinal detachment in pregnancy-induced hypertension
Published in
International Medical Case Reports Journal, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/imcrj.s95442
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ranko Aoyagi, Takaaki Hayashi, Hiroshi Tsuneoka

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to report optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiographic findings in a patient with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH). A 39-year-old woman, who was diagnosed with PIH, reported blurred and distorted vision at 5 days after an emergency cesarean delivery. OCT revealed a large serous retinal detachment (SRD) that included areas in the macula, along with an increased choroidal thickness noted in both eyes. Indocyanine green angiograms indicated delayed filling of the choroidal circulation in the early phase but choroidal hyperpermeability in the mid-phase. The SRD was gradually resolving without any treatment except for antihypertensive drugs. At 40 days after the initial examination, OCT revealed both the disappearance of the SRD and marked improvement of the choroidal thickening. Ophthalmologists need to be aware that PIH can cause choroidal ischemia, a breakdown of the outer blood-retinal barrier, and lead to the development of SRD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2015.
All research outputs
#12,938,548
of 22,833,393 outputs
Outputs from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#89
of 374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,682
of 284,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Medical Case Reports Journal
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,833,393 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.