Title |
Categorization of COPD patients in Turkey via GOLD 2013 strategy document: ALPHABET study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/copd.s87464 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hakan Gunen, Mehmet Yilmaz, Oguz Aktas, Pinar Ergun, Gonenc Ortakoylu, Atike Demir, Pelin Cetinkaya, Muge Otlu, Aykut Cilli, Ufuk Yilmaz, Nurdan Kokturk, Ipek Candemir, Halil Ibrahim Yakar, Idilhan Ar, Aylin Konya, Alev Gurgun |
Abstract |
To determine distribution of COPD assessment categories and physicians' adherence to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2013 strategy in Turkish COPD patients. A total of 1,610 COPD patients (mean [standard deviation] age: 62.6 [9.9] years, 85.7% were males) were included in this multicenter, non-interventional, cross-sectional study. Patients were categorized via GOLD 2013 strategy document. Consistency between reported and re-classified GOLD categories, and measures used for symptom evaluation and exacerbation was analyzed. Overall, 41.1% of patients were assigned to GOLD A, while 13.2% were assigned to GOLD C categories. Long-acting beta-2 agonist + long-acting muscarinic antagonist + inhaled corticosteroid regimen was the most common treatment (62.0%). Over-treatment was noted in >70% of GOLD A, B, and C patients. A high consistency between measures of symptom evaluation (Kappa coefficient =0.993, P<0.0001) and a low-moderate consistency between exacerbation risk measures (Kappa coefficient =0.237, P<0.0001) were noted. Our findings revealed GOLD A as the most prevalent category in Turkish cohort of COPD patients. Group assignment was altered depending on the chosen measure for symptom and risk assessment. Physician non-adherence to treatment recommendations in GOLD 2013 document leading to over-treatment in patients assigned to GOLD A, B, and C categories was also detected. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 23% |
Other | 3 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
Energy | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 27% |