| Title |
Efficacy of CR4056, a first-in-class imidazoline-2 analgesic drug, in comparison with naproxen in two rat models of osteoarthritis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Pain Research, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jpr.s132026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eleonora Comi, Marco Lanza, Flora Ferrari, Valeria Mauri, Gianfranco Caselli, Lucio Claudio Rovati |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 22% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,575,658
of 23,102,082 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#767
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,611
of 311,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#28
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,102,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,044 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.