Title |
The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/clep.s91125 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Morten Schmidt, Sigrun Alba Johannesdottir Schmidt, Jakob Lynge Sandegaard, Vera Ehrenstein, Lars Pedersen, Henrik Toft Sørensen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 2 | 14% |
Japan | 2 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 7% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
Sweden | 1 | 7% |
Belgium | 1 | 7% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,393 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Denmark | 7 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 1381 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 312 | 22% |
Researcher | 207 | 15% |
Student > Master | 186 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 105 | 8% |
Other | 72 | 5% |
Other | 142 | 10% |
Unknown | 369 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 595 | 43% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 42 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 29 | 2% |
Computer Science | 28 | 2% |
Other | 199 | 14% |
Unknown | 467 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2024.
All research outputs
#554,295
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#23
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,216
of 298,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them