↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical leadership development in postgraduate medical education and training: policy, strategy, and delivery in the UK National Health Service

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Healthcare Leadership, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 126)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
Title
Clinical leadership development in postgraduate medical education and training: policy, strategy, and delivery in the UK National Health Service
Published in
Journal of Healthcare Leadership, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/jhl.s69330
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reena Aggarwal, Tim Swanwick

Abstract

Achieving high quality health care against a background of continual change, increasing demand, and shrinking financial resource is a major challenge. However, there is significant international evidence that when clinicians use their voices and values to engage with system delivery, operational efficiency and care outcomes are improved. In the UK National Health Service, the traditional divide between doctors and managers is being bridged, as clinical leadership is now foregrounded as an important organizational priority. There are 60,000 doctors in postgraduate training (junior doctors) in the UK who provide the majority of front-line patient care and form an "operating core" of most health care organizations. This group of doctors is therefore seen as an important resource in initiating, championing, and delivering improvement in the quality of patient care. This paper provides a brief overview of leadership theories and constructs that have been used to develop a raft of interventions to develop leadership capability among junior doctors. We explore some of the approaches used, including competency frameworks, talent management, shared learning, clinical fellowships, and quality improvement. A new paradigm is identified as necessary to make a difference at a local level, which moves learning and leadership away from developing "leaders", to a more inclusive model of developing relationships between individuals within organizations. This shifts the emphasis from the development of a "heroic" individual leader to a more distributed model, where organizations are "leader-ful" and not just "well led" and leadership is centered on a shared vision owned by whole teams working on the frontline.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 155 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 23%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 46 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 16 10%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 53 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,298,468
of 24,780,938 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#29
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,778
of 290,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Healthcare Leadership
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,780,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.