↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Nanotechnology-based inhalation treatments for lung cancer: state of the art

Overview of attention for article published in Nanotechnology Science and Applications, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
160 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
243 Mendeley
Title
Nanotechnology-based inhalation treatments for lung cancer: state of the art
Published in
Nanotechnology Science and Applications, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/nsa.s49052
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javed Ahmad, Sohail Akhter, Md Rizwanullah, Saima Amin, Mahfoozur Rahman, Mohammad Zaki Ahmad, Moshahid Alam Rizvi, Mohammad A Kamal, Farhan Jalees Ahmad

Abstract

Considering the challenges associated with conventional chemotherapy, targeted and local delivery of chemotherapeutics via nanoparticle (NP) carriers to the lungs is an emerging area of interest. Recent studies and growing clinical application in cancer nanotechnology showed the huge potential of NPs as drug carriers in cancer therapy, including in lung carcinoma for diagnosis, imaging, and theranostics. Researchers have confirmed that nanotechnology-based inhalation chemotherapy is viable and more effective than conventional chemotherapy, with lesser side effects. Recently, many nanocarriers have been investigated, including liposomes, polymeric micelles, polymeric NPs, solid lipid NPs, and inorganic NPs for inhalation treatments of lung cancer. Yet, the toxicity of such nanomaterials to the lungs tissues and further distribution to other organs due to systemic absorption on inhalation delivery is a debatable concern. Here, prospect of NPs-based local lung cancer targeting through inhalation route as well as its associated challenges are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 238 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 13%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Researcher 22 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 4%
Other 46 19%
Unknown 72 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 46 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 7%
Engineering 16 7%
Chemical Engineering 12 5%
Other 44 18%
Unknown 86 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,455,565
of 25,584,565 outputs
Outputs from Nanotechnology Science and Applications
#12
of 64 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,879
of 295,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nanotechnology Science and Applications
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,584,565 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them