Title |
Violence within mental health services: how to enhance risk management
|
---|---|
Published in |
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy, September 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/rmhp.s131834 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Margaret O’Rourke, Conal Wrigley, Sean Hammond |
Abstract |
This paper aims to present best practice in risk management within mental health services. Its purpose is to explore the prevalence of violence within mental health services, to examine the nature of risk, highlight lessons learned and guidance published on safer services, and to identify ways to enhance risk management in mental health care. We reflect on current health care practices in the UK, England and Wales, and Ireland and refer to research and practice from other jurisdictions internationally where it exists. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 33% |
Canada | 2 | 33% |
Spain | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 12 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 25% |
Psychology | 6 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Other | 3 | 5% |
Unknown | 22 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#8,056,964
of 25,789,020 outputs
Outputs from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#234
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,632
of 346,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,789,020 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.