↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Clinical utility of landiolol for use in coronary CT angiography

Overview of attention for article published in Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, November 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Clinical utility of landiolol for use in coronary CT angiography
Published in
Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology, November 2015
DOI 10.2147/rrcc.s77559
Authors

Nobuo Tomizawa, Yayoi Hayakawa, Shinichi Inoh, Takeshi Nojo, Sunao Nakamura

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Student > Master 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2015.
All research outputs
#20,247,404
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#203,174
of 295,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Reports in Clinical Cardiology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.8. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them