↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Identification of key candidate genes and small molecule drugs in cervical cancer by bioinformatics strategy

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Identification of key candidate genes and small molecule drugs in cervical cancer by bioinformatics strategy
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s171661
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xin Tang, Yicong Xu, Lin Lu, Yang Jiao, Jianjun Liu, Linlin Wang, Hongbo Zhao

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is one of the most common malignant tumors among women. The present study aimed at integrating two expression profile datasets to identify critical genes and potential drugs in CC. Expression profiles, GSE7803 and GSE9750, were integrated using bioinformatics methods, including differentially expressed genes analysis, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis, and protein-protein interaction (PPI) network construction. Subsequently, survival analysis was performed among the key genes using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis websites. Connectivity Map (CMap) was used to query potential drugs for CC. A total of 145 upregulated genes and 135 downregulated genes in CC were identified. The functional changes of these differentially expressed genes related to CC were mainly associated with cell cycle, DNA replication, p53 signaling pathway, and oocyte meiosis. A PPI network was identified by STRING with 220 nodes and 2,111 edges. Thirteen key genes were identified as the intersecting genes of the enrichment pathways and the top 20 nodes in PPI network. Survival analysis revealed that high mRNA expression of MCM2, PCNA, and RFC4 was significantly associated with longer overall survival, and the survival was significantly better in the low-expression RRM2 group. Moreover, CMap predicted nine small molecules as possible adjuvant drugs to treat CC. Our study found key dysregulated genes involved in CC and potential drugs to combat it, which might provide insights into CC pathogenesis and might shed light on potential CC treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Other 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 11%
Computer Science 2 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 12 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2018.
All research outputs
#18,649,291
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,057
of 2,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,934
of 335,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#62
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.