Title |
A review of cognitive conflicts research: a meta-analytic study of prevalence and relation to symptoms
|
---|---|
Published in |
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, December 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/ndt.s91861 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Adrián Montesano, María Angeles López-González, Luis Angel Saúl, Guillem Feixas |
Abstract |
Recent research has highlighted the role of implicative dilemmas in a variety of clinical conditions. These dilemmas are a type of cognitive conflict, in which different aspects of the self are countered in such a way that a desired change in a personal dimension (eg, symptom improvement) may be hindered by the need of personal coherence in another dimension. The aim of this study was to summarize, using a meta-analytical approach, the evidence relating to the presence and the level of this conflict, as well as its relationship with well-being, in various clinical samples. A systematic review using multiple electronic databases found that out of 37 articles assessed for eligibility, nine fulfilled the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. Random effects model was applied when computing mean effect sizes and testing for heterogeneity level. Statistically significant associations were observed between the clinical status and the presence of dilemmas, as well as level of conflict across several clinical conditions. Likewise, the level of conflict was associated with symptom severity. Results highlighted the clinical relevance and the transdiagnostic nature of implicative dilemmas. |
X Demographics
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 68 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
Researcher | 11 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
Other | 12 | 16% |
Unknown | 17 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 42 | 58% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
Other | 4 | 5% |
Unknown | 21 | 29% |