Title |
The predictive capacity and additional prognostic power of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide in Chinese elderly with chronic heart failure
|
---|---|
Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, January 2015
|
DOI | 10.2147/cia.s77417 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shihui Fu, Leixing Xie, Dongyun Li, Ping Ye, Leiming Luo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 19 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 15% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 6 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 40% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
Chemistry | 2 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#818
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,289
of 359,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#22
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.