↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Low tumor purity is associated with poor prognosis, heavy mutation burden, and intense immune phenotype in colon cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
Title
Low tumor purity is associated with poor prognosis, heavy mutation burden, and intense immune phenotype in colon cancer
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s171855
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yihao Mao, Qingyang Feng, Peng Zheng, Liangliang Yang, Tianyu Liu, Yuqiu Xu, Dexiang Zhu, Wenju Chang, Meiling Ji, Li Ren, Ye Wei, Guodong He, Jianmin Xu

Abstract

Tumor purity is defined as the proportion of cancer cells in the tumor tissue. The impact of tumor purity on colon cancer (CC) prognosis, genetic profile, and microenvironment has not been thoroughly accessed. Clinical and transcriptomic data from three public datasets, GSE17536/17537, GSE39582, and TCGA, were retrospectively collected (n=1,248). Tumor purity of each sample was inferred by a computational method based on transcriptomic data. Survival-related analyses were performed on microarray dataset containing GSE17536/17537 and GSE39582 (n=794), whereas TCGA dataset was utilized for subsequent genomic analysis (n=454). Right-sided CC patients showed a significantly lower tumor purity. Low purity CC conferred worse survival, and tumor purity was identified as an independent prognostic factor. Moreover, high tumor purity CC patients benefited more from adjuvant chemotherapy. Subsequent genomic analysis found that the mutation burden was negatively associated with tumor purity, with only APC and KRAS significantly more mutated in high purity CC. However, no somatic copy number alteration event was correlated with tumor purity. Furthermore, immune-related pathways and immunotherapy-associated markers (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1], programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1], cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA-4], Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 [LAG-3] and T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 [TIM-3]) were highly enriched in low purity samples. Notably, the relative proportion of M2 macrophages and neutrophils, which indicated worse survival in CC, was negatively associated with tumor purity. Tumor purity exhibited potential value for CC prognostic stratification as well as adjuvant chemotherapy benefit prediction. The relative worse survival in low purity CC may attribute to higher mutation frequency in key pathways and purity-related microenvironmental changing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 17 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2021.
All research outputs
#6,382,652
of 23,103,436 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#260
of 2,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,632
of 335,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#18
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,103,436 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,017 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.