| Title |
The appeal of the Functional Fitness MOT to older adults and health professionals in an outpatient setting: a mixed-method feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, September 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s173481 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lex D de Jong, Andy D Peters, Sheena Gawler, Nina Chalmers, Claire Henderson, Julie Hooper, Robert Laventure, Laura McLean, Dawn A Skelton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 10 | 13% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 34 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,241,141
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#574
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,722
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#17
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.