| Title |
Lumbar facet injection for the treatment of chronic piriformis myofascial pain syndrome: 52 case studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, August 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s64736 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jen-Ting Huang, Han-Yu Chen, Chang-Zern Hong, Ming-Ta Lin, Li-Wei Chou, Hsin-Shui Chen, Chien-Tsung Tsai, Wen-Dien Chang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 45 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 10 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 17% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#864
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,230
of 240,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#15
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.