| Title |
Magnetic single-walled carbon nanotubes as efficient drug delivery nanocarriers in breast cancer murine model: noninvasive monitoring using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as sensitive imaging biomarker
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s75074 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Achraf Al Faraj, Abjal Pasha Shaik, Asma Sultana Shaik |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 106 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Researcher | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 12 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 8% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 19% |
| Unknown | 39 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,757
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,631
of 369,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#36
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.