↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The epigenetic mechanisms of nanotopography-guided osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via high-throughput transcriptome sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
The epigenetic mechanisms of nanotopography-guided osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells via high-throughput transcriptome sequencing
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2018
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s168928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Longwei Lv, Yunsong Liu, Ping Zhang, Xiangsong Bai, Xiaohan Ma, Yuejun Wang, Hongyi Li, Li Wang, Yongsheng Zhou

Abstract

Nanotopography directs stem cell fate; however, the underlying mechanisms, especially those at the epigenetic level, remain vague. The TiO2-nanotube array, a classical example of nanotopography, is a good model to investigate topography-cell interactions because of its good controllability and easy manufacturing process. Previously, we found that a TiO2-nanotube array with an optimal diameter promoted osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-tissue-derived stem cells (hASCs). We used RNA sequencing and bioinformatics to reveal the overall gene expression profile of hASCs on TiO2-nanotube arrays. Bioinformatics analyses revealed that the epigenetic regulatory network plays an important role in TiO2-nanotube-guided osteogenic differentiation. Changes in cell adhesion and cytoskeletal reorganization are linked to epigenetic alterations, including upregulation of KDM4E and downregulation of histone deacetylases. Meanwhile, microRNAs, including miR-24-1-5p, miR-24-3 p, miR-154-3 p, miR-154-5 p, miR-433-5 p, miR-589-3 p, and miR-589-5 p were downregulated, whereas miR-186-5 p and miR-770-5 p were upregulated. Long non-coding RNAs, including LINC00941, LINC01279, and ZFAS1, were downregulated in this process. Using next-generation sequencing, we illustrated the overall picture of the regulatory mechanisms of TiO2 nanotubes, thus providing a basis for future clinical applications of nanotopography in the field of bone tissue engineering. Our results offer insights into material-based nanomedicine and epigenetic therapy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Other 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 13%
Materials Science 3 13%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2018.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#2,087
of 4,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,802
of 345,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#38
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,122 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,739 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.