| Title |
Altered diastolic function and aortic stiffness in Alzheimer’s disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s63337 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nazmi Calik, Damirbek Osmonov, Mehmet Karaca, Osman Bolca, Kazim Serhan Ozcan, Ahmet Ekmekci, Baris Gungor, Adem Tatlisu, Izzet Erdinler, Emre Arugaslan, Gulbun Yuksel, Figen Varlibas |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 16% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2018.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#1,190
of 1,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,053
of 229,255 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#24
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,255 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.