↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The impact of ribavirin on real-world adherence rates in hepatitis C patients treated with sofosbuvir plus simeprevir

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, December 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
The impact of ribavirin on real-world adherence rates in hepatitis C patients treated with sofosbuvir plus simeprevir
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, December 2015
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s87261
Pubmed ID
Authors

David R Walker, Timothy R Juday, Shivaji R Manthena, Yonghua Jing, Vipan Sood

Abstract

Combination therapy with sofosbuvir (SOF) and simeprevir (SIM) is used to treat patients with hepatitis C virus infection. It is currently unknown whether adding ribavirin (RBV) to SOF + SIM, which raises the pill count from two up to eight pills a day, impacts adherence. The aim of this study is to examine the impact of pill count on real-world adherence rates in patients treated with SOF + SIM with and without RBV. This retrospective study assessed composite adherence to SOF and SIM over 12 weeks of treatment for two cohorts of hepatitis C patients: one initiating SOF + SIM therapy, and the other initiating SOF + SIM + RBV therapy. Analyses were conducted using MarketScan(®) and Optum US commercial pharmacy claims and enrollment data. Adherence was adjusted by treatment regimen, age, sex, co-pay, presence/absence of cirrhosis, treatment history, and Charlson Comorbidity Index. There was a significant difference in composite unadjusted and adjusted adherence rates for SOF and SIM for the SOF + SIM vs SOF + SIM + RBV cohorts based on MarketScan data (unadjusted, 92.6% and 89.7%, respectively; P=0.0423; adjusted, 92.2% and 88.7%, respectively; P=0.0176), but not based on Optum data (unadjusted, 94.8% and 95.6%, respectively; P=0.5618; adjusted, 94.8% and 95.1%, respectively; P=0.8589). In the MarketScan and Optum databases, there were no statistical differences in unadjusted and adjusted adherence rates for SOF. Unadjusted and adjusted adherence rates for SIM were mixed, as they were for composite adherence. The impact of the addition of RBV to SOF + SIM therapy was mixed. The impact of RBV on SOF adherence was not significant in either database.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 4 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2015.
All research outputs
#15,739,010
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#292
of 531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,654
of 395,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#7
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.