↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Evolution of transversus abdominis plane infiltration techniques for postsurgical analgesia following abdominal surgeries

Overview of attention for article published in Local and Regional Anesthesia , December 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of transversus abdominis plane infiltration techniques for postsurgical analgesia following abdominal surgeries
Published in
Local and Regional Anesthesia , December 2015
DOI 10.2147/lra.s96253
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Gadsden, Sabry Ayad, Jeffrey J Gonzales, Jaideep Mehta, Jan Boublik, Jacob Hutchins

Abstract

Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) infiltration is a regional anesthesia technique that has been demonstrated to be effective for management of postsurgical pain after abdominal surgery. There are several different clinical variations in the approaches used for achieving analgesia via TAP infiltration, and methods for identification of the TAP have evolved considerably since the landmark-guided technique was first described in 2001. There are many factors that impact the analgesic outcomes following TAP infiltration, and the various nuances of this technique have led to debate regarding procedural classification of TAP infiltration. Based on our current understanding of fascial and neuronal anatomy of the anterior abdominal wall, as well as available evidence from studies assessing local anesthetic spread and cutaneous sensory block following TAP infiltration, it is clear that TAP infiltration techniques are appropriately classified as field blocks. While the objective of peripheral nerve block and TAP infiltration are similar in that both approaches block sensory response in order to achieve analgesia, the technical components of the two procedures are different. Unlike peripheral nerve block, which involves identification or stimulation of a specific nerve or nerve plexus, followed by administration of a local anesthetic in close proximity, TAP infiltration involves administration and spread of local anesthetic within an anatomical plane of the surgical site.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 54 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 11 20%
Other 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2017.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#75
of 114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,106
of 395,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Local and Regional Anesthesia
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 395,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.